
Duration: ± 2 weeks
Use when: Your organization need a fast situational read.
Signals: Delivery tension, milestone ambiguity, rising silence.
Output: RAG heatmap + execution scorecard.
EXAMPLES
• Division KPIs drift but CFO demands evidence
• Board wants a health signal pre-budget approval
• PE due-diligence needs a 2-week execution snapshot
Duration: ± 4–6 weeks
Use when: There’s failure to implement, or drift after recovery.
Signals: Systemic friction, failed handovers, KPI inflation.
Output: Cause map, root chains, impact zones.
EXAMPLES
• Cloud migration frozen after multiple extensions
• Regulator requests root-cause proof before sign-off
• Internal rescue failed; confidence and morale are low
Duration: ± 3 weeks
Use when: Formal decisions don’t translate to execution.
Signals: Strategy logic lost in delivery, or governance overload.
Output: Rhythm map, signal traceability, KPI-to-delivery audit.
EXAMPLES
• Board motions pass yet delivery stalls in every silo
• Chair suspects decision-rights fog and KPI theatre
• New CEO wants mandate-to-delivery gap exposed quickly
Duration: ± 2 weeks
Use when: Pre-ERP, SaaS, or cloud shifts are being launched.
Signals: Tech project anxiety, unclear accountability, DevOps bottlenecks.
Output: Capability matrix, DevSecOps maturity score.
EXAMPLES
• ERP cut-over in 6 months, defect trend rising
• Cloud modernisation lacks DevOps maturity metrics
• Talent gaps threaten milestone credibility
ⓘ Not sure where to start ? We recommend beginning with a Pulse-Check or Governance Stress Test for fast signal clarity. Start within days — not weeks.
| Diagnostic | Best when you need… ⓘ examples given are illustrative | Clock-speed ⓘ estimates | Typical red flag | What you receive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execution Pulse-Check | Rapid strategy-execution assessment for boards or divisional leaders needing a health signal before the next funding or milestone gate. Ideal for execution concerns. | ± 2-3 weeks | Early KPI drift • delivery slows but status stays “green” | RAG heat-map + top-5 corrective levers |
| Forensic Execution Audit | A deep strategy-execution audit to prove root cause of an over-budget programme: KPIs, culture, delivery breakdowns. | ± 4–6 weeks | Chronic overruns • failed recovery • regulator pressure | Causal-chain map, financial exposure, and recovery roadmap |
| Board Governance Stress Test | A governance alignment assessment to check mandate ↔ delivery fit. We audit the governance rhythm, strategic signal clarity, and decision bottlenecks. | ± 3-4 weeks | Decisions approved yet progress stalls • board tension | Decision-loop audit, KPI-to-value trace |
| Digital Execution Readiness Scan | A pre-live readiness assessment for major ERP/Cloud go-live. We assess delivery capacity, architectural constraints, and DevSecOps maturity. | ± 2-4 weeks | 90-day deadline • talent or stack risk • CAPEX at stake | DevSecOps maturity grid, readiness score |
* When diagnostic inconsistencies escalate into governance drift, the natural continuation is the Execution Forensic Audit, a senior-led investigation designed to re-anchor decision logic and quantify value-at-risk across functions.
ⓘ No implementation commitment is required.
These diagnostics are insight tools — not sales funnels.

Each report we produce at Debbaut.Solutions is a high-stakes clarity act — executed by those who’ve run what they now assess.
Our method is structured through the Execution Framework™, a proprietary model that blends strategic intent, delivery architecture, and failure point detection. In short, we expose what blocks delivery — and why.
We blend interviews, artifacts, and delivery telemetry with a structured evaluation matrix covering: governance, delivery design, KPI structure, velocity, alignment, failure triggers. Each diagnostic follows a sequenced trace, grounded in real-world constraints. Each diagnostic is personally overseen by Elena Debbaut — no delegation or hand-offs to junior staff. You speak directly with operators who’ve rebuilt failing programs.
We’re not at your HQ to explain why it’s hard. We’re there to show what to do about it — fast.
Yes. Our method is built for remote, board-secure delivery. Interviews, document sweeps, delivery data and reviews are all handled via encrypted channels. On-site visits remain optional, discreet, and are scoped only if a physical walk-through adds real value.
Just a sponsor and 2-3 functional leads (strategy, finance, delivery). We never require large workshops or data-wrangling task forces. The process is designed to keep disruption—and politics—to a minimum.
It refers to systematic collection and analysis of live execution data (KPIs, logs, systems metrics) that we use to map and trace delivery friction. Learn more about the technology behind it in our CTS-EMEA Telemetry Data Services or explore the practical data processing software Toolkits in CTS-EMEIA Labs.
Absolutely. Every engagement starts with an NDA and a controlled access list. Deliverables are stored in Swiss data centres and never reused for marketing or benchmarking without your explicit approval.
You decide. The diagnostic is a standalone clarity tool, as there is no upsell from Debbaut.Solutions. Many clients retain us for turnaround support; others use the findings with internal teams or existing integrators. Your mandate, your call.
Minimal. We ask for a recent organisational chart, the latest KPI pack, and access to key stakeholders for 40 to 90 minute interviews. No extensive data grooming or slide decks is needed from your side because our speed and operator efficiency are the point.
An Execution Diagnostic is not a stand-alone audit. It establishes the evidence a board, PE sponsor or executive team needs to decide what happens next: restore decision control through Execution Governance, redesign the operating model through Operational Restructuring, or concentrate authority and execution capacity through a Task-Force Enterprise mandate.
The diagnostic therefore connects evidence to action without restarting the mandate or handing the problem to another advisory layer.
